4/15/2023 0 Comments Virtual scoreboard 4![]() What pearls, pitfalls and/or tips do you have for users of the Padua Prediction Score? Are there cases in which it has been applied, interpreted, or used inappropriately? ![]() The Padua Prediction Score (PPS) has been created to guide clinicians in identifying patients at "sufficient" risk to warrant prophylaxis. Age, immobility, active cancer, infections and acute inflammatory states are known major risk factors for hospitalization-related VTE however, the contribution of each risk factor to the “magnitude” of VTE risk and the interaction between them is not easy to determine in clinical practice. High risk inpatients not receiving thromboprophylaxis develop deep-vein thrombosis in 5 to 15% of cases and pulmonary embolism in up to 1.5%.Įven though the usefulness of thromboprophylaxis is well known, the choice to prescribe it in clinical practice, especially in complex medical patients, is challenging. About 25% of all cases of VTE are related to hospitalization, and up to 75% of them occur in medical patients. Medical inpatients are at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Why did you develop the Padua Prediction Score? Was there a clinical experience that inspired you to create this tool for clinicians?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |